Evidence or Empty Promises? What Hospitals Really Ask About AI Solutions 

As AI and sensor technology continue to enter healthcare, decision-makers often face the same two critical questions: 

1. Does it actually work? 
2. Can it be seamlessly integrated into real-world care environments? 

At Verso Vision, we’ve heard these questions many times, and for good reason. In an environment where safety is paramount and time is limited, these aren’t just technical questions. They’re questions of trust, credibility, and practical value. 

The evidence gap: Why “Proven” matters 

Today, there are more than a dozen sensor-based solutions for fall detection available in Europe alone. Yet, despite all the promises of innovation, most lack scientific validation or published results. 

Hospitals can’t afford to pilot every option on the market. Without clear evidence, it’s nearly impossible to determine what actually improves patient safety. 

That’s why Verso Vision focuses relentlessly on producing validated results. Our system has been evaluated in multiple countries and care environments. For example: 

• A peer-reviewed study from Italy showed a 57% reduction in falls with the Verso system in place 

• In Finland, every university hospital has adopted Verso Vision, and a doctoral thesis from Kuopio University Hospital is underway to further assess our impact. 

We actively support independent research and encourage facilities to publish results, whether in internal reports, academic theses, or peer-reviewed journals.